Fertilizer (or fertiliser) is any organic or inorganic material of natural or synthetic origin (other than liming materials) that is added to a soil to supply one or more plant nutrients essential to the growth of plants.[1] A recent assessment found that about 40 to 60% of crop yields are attributable to commercial fertilizer use.[2]

Mined inorganic fertilizers have been used for many centuries, whereas chemically synthesized inorganic fertilizers were only widely developed during the industrial revolution. Increased understanding and use of fertilizers were important parts of the pre-industrial British Agricultural Revolution and the industrial Green Revolution of the 20th century.

Inorganic fertilizer use has also significantly supported global population growth — it has been estimated that almost half the people on the Earth are currently fed as a result of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer use.[3]Fertilizers typically provide, in varying proportions:The macronutrients are consumed in larger quantities and are present in plant tissue in quantities from 0.15% to 6.0% on a dry matter (0% moisture) basis (DM). Micronutrients are consumed in smaller quantities and are present in plant tissue on the order of parts per million (ppm), ranging from 0.15 to 400 ppm DM, or less than 0.04% DM.[4][5]

Only three other macronutrients are required by all plants: carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. These nutrients are supplied by water and carbon dioxide.

The nitrogen-rich fertilizer ammonium nitrate is also used as an oxidizing agent in improvised explosive devices, sometimes called fertilizer bombs, leading to sale regulations.

Frische Gülleeinfüllung in ein offenes Güllesilo - Urheber: Moehre1992


The labeling of fertilizers varies by country in terms of analysis methodology and subsequent nutrient labeling. In most countries the macronutrients are labeled with an NPK analysis (in Australia, "N-P-K-S" adding sulfur).[6]

The three numbers on the fertilizer label represent an analysis of the composition by weight. These three numbers correspond to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (N-P-K) and always appear in that specific order. When a 4th number is included, it indicates the sulfur content (N-P-K-S).

While the number for "N" represents the percentage weight of nitrogen, the other two components are not for the analysis of the element, but rather, the analysis of the "available" or "soluble" form of the element. In traditional chemical analysis, the tests used treated the sample so as to measure the equivalent P2O5 and K2O. For instance, some potassium-bearing rocks do not count as having available potassium.

The number for "P" is actually the weight of an equivalent quantity of P2O5 and not elemental phosphorus. In order to calculate the weight of P in the formulation, the weight of P2O5 can be multiplied by 0.44 to compensate for the weight of the oxygen in the molecule. For example, a bag of 10-10-10 has 10 pounds of nitrogen, 10 pounds of P2O5, but only 4.4 pounds of P.

Likewise, the number for "K" is actually the weight of an equivalent quantity of K2O, and not elemental potassium. In order to calculate the weight of K in the formulation, the weight of K2O can be multiplied by 0.83 to compensate for the weight of the oxygen in the molecule. For example, a bag of 10-10-10 has 10 pounds of K2O, but only 8.3 pounds of K.

As an example, the fertilizer potash (in modern times, potassium chloride) is composed of 52% potassium and 48% chlorine by weight; chemical analysis of 100g of potassium chloride (KCl), would show 63g of equivalent potassium oxide (K2O) when done in the manner of fertilizer analysis. The percentage yield of K2O from the original 100g of fertilizer is the number shown on the label. A potash fertilizer would thus be labeled 0-0-63, and not 0-0-52.


The modern understanding of plant nutrition dates to the 19th century and the work of Justus von Liebig, among others. Management of soil fertility, however, has been the pre-occupation of farmers for thousands of years.


Fertilizers come in various forms. The most typical form is granular fertilizer (powder form). The next most common form is liquid fertilizer; some advantages of liquid fertilizer are its immediate effect and wide coverage. There are also slow-release fertilizers (various forms including fertilizer spikes, tabs, etc.) which reduce the problem of "burning" the plants due to excess nitrogen.

More recently, organic fertilizer is on the rise as people are resorting to environmental friendly (or 'green') products. Although organic fertilizer usually contain less nutrients, some people still prefer organic due to natural ingredients

Inorganic fertilizer (synthetic fertilizer)

Fertilizers are broadly divided into organic fertilizers (composed of enriched organic matter—plant or animal), or inorganic fertilizers (composed of synthetic chemicals and/or minerals).

Inorganic fertilizer is often synthesized using the Haber-Bosch process, which produces ammonia as the end product. This ammonia is used as a feedstock for other nitrogen fertilizers, such as anhydrous ammonium nitrate and urea. These concentrated products may be diluted with water to form a concentrated liquid fertilizer (e.g. UAN). Ammonia can be combined with rock phosphate and potassium fertilizer in the Odda Process to produce compound fertilizer.

The use of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers has increased steadily in the last 50 years, rising almost 20-fold to the current rate of 100 million tonnes of nitrogen per year.[7] The use of phosphate fertilizers has also increased from 9 million tonnes per year in 1960 to 40 million tonnes per year in 2000. A maize crop yielding 6-9 tonnes of grain per hectare requires 31–50 kg of phosphate fertilizer to be applied, soybean requires 20–25 kg per hectare.[8]Yara International is the world's largest producer of nitrogen based fertilizers.[9]

Controlled-release types

Urea and formaldehyde, reacted together to produce sparingly soluble polymers of various molecular weights, is one of the oldest controlled-nitrogen-release technologies, having been first produced in 1936 and commercialized in 1955.[10] The early product had 60 percent of the total nitrogen cold-water-insoluble, and the unreacted (quick release) less than 15%. Methylene ureas were commercialized in the 1960s and 1970s, having 25 and 60% of the nitrogen cold-water-insoluble, and unreacted urea nitrogen in the range of 15 to 30%. Isobutylidene diurea, unlike the methylurea polymers, is a single crystalline solid of relatively uniform properties, with about 90% of the nitrogen water-insoluble.

In the 1960s the National Fertilizer Development Center began developing Sulfur-coated urea; sulfur was used as the principle coating material because of its low cost and its value as a secondary nutrient.[10] Usually there is another wax or polymer which seals the sulfur; the slow release properties depend on the degradation of the secondary sealant by soil microbes as well as mechanical imperfections (cracks, etc.) in the sulfur. They typically provide 6 to 16 weeks of delayed release in turf applications. When a hard polymer is used as the secondary coating, the properties are a cross between diffusion-controlled particles and traditional sulfur-coated.

Other coated products use thermoplastics (and sometimes ethylene-vinyl acetate and surfactants, etc.) to produce diffusion-controlled release of urea or soluble inorganic fertilizers. "Reactive Layer Coating" can produce thinner, hence cheaper, membrane coatings by applying reactive monomers simultaneously to the soluble particles. "Multicote" is a process applying layers of low-cost fatty acid salts with a paraffin topcoat.

Besides being more efficient in the utilization of the applied nutrients, slow-release technologies also reduce the impact on the environment and the contamination of the subsurface water.[10]


Synthetic fertilizers are commonly used to treat fields used for growing maize, followed by barley, sorghum, rapeseed, soy and sunflower. One study has shown that application of nitrogen fertilizer on off-season cover crops can increase the biomass (and subsequent green manure value) of these crops, while having a beneficial effect on soil nitrogen levels for the main crop planted during the summer season.[12]

Nutrients in soil can be thrown out of balance with high concentrations of fertilizers. The interconnectedness and complexity of this soil ‘food web’ means any appraisal of soil function must necessarily take into account interactions with the living communities that exist within the soil. Stability of the system is reduced by the use of nitrogen-containing fertilizers, which cause soil acidification.

Applying excessive amounts of fertilizer has negative environmental effects, and wastes the growers' time and money. To avoid over-application, the nutrient status of crops should be assessed. Nutrient deficiency can be detected by visually assessing the physical symptoms of the crop. Nitrogen deficiency, for example has a distinctive presentation in some species. However, quantitative tests are more reliable for detecting nutrient deficiency before it has significantly affected the crop. Both soil tests and Plant Tissue Tests are used in agriculture to fine-tune nutrient management to the crops needs.

Top users of nitrogen-based fertilizer
CountryTotal N use

(Mt pa)

Amt. used





Problems with inorganic fertilizer

Trace mineral depletion

Many inorganic fertilizers may not replace trace mineral elements in the soil which become gradually depleted by crops. This depletion has been linked to studies which have shown a marked fall (up to 75%) in the quantities of such minerals present in fruit and vegetables.[13]

In Western Australia deficiencies of zinc, copper, manganese, iron and molybdenum were identified as limiting the growth of broad-acre crops and pastures in the 1940s and 1950s. Soils in Western Australia are very old, highly weathered and deficient in many of the major nutrients and trace elements. Since this time these trace elements are routinely added to inorganic fertilizers used in agriculture in this state.


Over-fertilization of a vital nutrient can be as detrimental as underfertilization.[14] "Fertilizer burn" can occur when too much fertilizer is applied, resulting in a drying out of the roots and damage or even death of the plant.[15]

High energy consumption

In the USA in 2004, 317 billion cubic feet of natural gas was consumed in the industrial production of ammonia, less than 1.5% of total U.S. annual consumption of natural gas. [16] A 2002 report suggested that the production of ammonia consumes about 5% of global natural gas consumption, which is somewhat under 2% of world energy production.[17]

Ammonia is overwhelmingly produced from natural gas, but other energy sources, together with a hydrogen source, can be used for the production of nitrogen compounds suitable for fertilizers. The cost of natural gas makes up about 90% of the cost of producing ammonia.[18] The increase in price of natural gases over the past decade, along with other factors such as increasing demand, have contributed to an increase in fertilizer price.[19]

Long-Term Sustainability

Inorganic fertilizers are now produced in ways which theoretically cannot be continued indefinitely by definition as the resources used in their production are non-renewable. Potassium and phosphorus come from mines (or saline lakes such as the Dead Sea) and such resources are limited. However, more effective fertilizer utilization practices may decrease present usage from mines. Improved knowledge of crop production practices can potentially decrease fertilizer usage of P and K without reducing the critical need to improve and increase crop yields. Atmospheric (unfixed) nitrogen is effectively unlimited (forming over 70% of the atmospheric gases), but this is not in a form useful to plants. To make nitrogen accessible to plants requires nitrogen fixation (conversion of atmospheric nitrogen to a plant-accessible form).

Artificial nitrogen fertilizers are typically synthesized using fossil fuels such as natural gas and coal, which are limited resources. In lieu of converting natural gas to syngas for use in the Haber process, it is also possible to convert renewable biomass to syngas (or wood gas) to supply the necessary energy for the process, though the amount of land and resources (ironically often including fertilizer) necessary for such a project may be prohibitive.

Organic fertilizer

Organic fertilizers include naturally occurring organic materials, (e.g. manure, worm castings, compost, seaweed, guano), or naturally occurring mineral deposits (e.g. saltpeter).

Benefits of organic fertilizer

Organic fertilizers have been known to improve biodiversity (soil life) and long-term productivity of soil,[20][21] and may prove a large depository for excess carbon dioxide.[22][23][24]

Organic nutrients increase the abundance of soil organisms by providing organic matter and micronutrients for organisms such as fungal mycorrhiza,[25] (which aid plants in absorbing nutrients), and can drastically reduce external inputs of pesticides, energy and fertilizer, at the cost of decreased yield.[26]

Disadvantages of organic fertilizers
  • Organic fertilizers may contain pathogens and other disease causing organisms if not properly composted
  • Nutrient contents are very variable and their release to available forms that the plant can use may not occur at the right plant growth stage
  • Organic fertilizers are comparatively voluminous and can be too bulky to deploy the right amount of nutrients that will be beneficial to plants
  • More expensive to produce

Comparison with inorganic fertilizer

Organic fertilizer nutrient content, solubility, and nutrient release rates are typically all lower than inorganic fertilizers.[27][28] One study[which?] found that over a 140-day period, after 7 leachings:
  • Organic fertilizers had released between 25% and 60% of their nitrogen content
  • Controlled release fertilizers (CRFs) had a relatively constant rate of release
  • Soluble fertilizer released most of its nitrogen content at the first leaching
In general, the nutrients in organic fertilizer are both more dilute and also much less readily available to plants. According to the University of California's integrated pest management program, all organic fertilizers are classified as 'slow-release' fertilizers, and therefore cannot cause nitrogen burn.[29]

Organic fertilizers from composts and other sources can be quite variable from one batch to the next.[30] Without batch testing, amounts of applied nutrient cannot be precisely known. Nevertheless they are at least as effective as chemical fertilizers over longer periods of use.[31]

Example of organic fertilizer

Chicken litter, which consists of chicken manure mixed with sawdust, is an organic fertilizer that has been shown to better condition soil for harvest than synthesized fertilizer. Researchers at the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) studied the effects of using chicken litter, an organic fertilizer, versus synthetic fertilizers on cotton fields, and found that fields fertilized with chicken litter had a 12% increase in cotton yields over fields fertilized with synthetic fertilizer. In addition to higher yields, researchers valued commercially sold chicken litter at a $17/ton premium (to a total valuation of $78/ton) over the traditional valuations of $61/ton due to value added as a soil conditioner.[32]

Other ARS studies have found that algae used to capture nitrogen and phosphorus runoff from agricultural fields can not only prevent water contamination of these nutrients, but also can be used as an organic fertilizer. ARS scientists originally developed the "algal turf scrubber" to reduce nutrient runoff and increase quality of water flowing into streams, rivers, and lakes. They found that this nutrient-rich algae, once dried, can be applied to cucumber and corn seedlings and result in growth comparable to that seen using synthetic fertilizers.[33]

Organic fertilizer sources


Animal-sourced and human urea are suitable for application organic agriculture, while pure synthetic forms of urea are not.[34][35] The common thread that can be seen through these examples is that organic agriculture attempts to define itself through minimal processing (in contrast to the man-made Haber process), as well as being naturally occurring or via natural biological processes such as composting.

Besides immediate application of urea to the soil, urine can also be improved by converting it to struvite already done with human urine by a Dutch firm.[36] The conversion is performed by adding magnesium to the urine. An added economical advantage of using urine as fertilizer is that it contains a large amount of phosphorus, a mineral whose production is rapidly decreasing (peak phosphorus) as the mines are running dry.

Sewage sludge (aka biosolids) use is only available to less than 1% of US ag land. USDA prohibits use of sewage sludge in organic agricultural operations in the U.S. has been extremely limited and rare due to of the practice (due to toxic metal accumulation, among other factors).[37][38] The USDA now requires 3rd-party certification of high-nitrogen liquid organic fertilizers sold in the U.S.[39]


Leguminous cover crops are also grown to enrich soil as a green manure through nitrogen fixation from the atmosphere;[40] as well as phosphorus (through nutrient mobilization)[41] content of soils.


Mined powdered limestone,[42]rock phosphate and sodium nitrate, are inorganic (not of biologic origins) compounds which are energetically intensive to harvest and are approved for usage in organic agriculture in minimal amounts.[42][43][44]

See also
  1. ^"Glossary of Soil Science Terms". Soil Science Society of America. Retrieved May 10, 2011.
  2. ^Stewart, W.M.; Dibb, D.W.; Johnston, A.E.; Smyth, T.J. (2005). "The Contribution of Commercial Fertilizer Nutrients to Food Production". Agronomy Journal97: 1–6. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0001
  3. ^Erisman, Jan Willem; MA Sutton, J Galloway, Z Klimont, W Winiwarter (October 2008). "How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world". Nature Geoscience1 (10): 636. doi:10.1038/ngeo325. Retrieved 22 October 2010.
  4. ^"AESL Plant Analysis Handbook - Nutrient Content of Plant". Aesl.ces.uga.edu. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  5. ^H.A. Mills, J.B. Jones Jr. (1996). Plant Analysis Handbook II: A practical Sampling, Preparation, Analysis, and Interpretation Guide. ISBN 1-878148-052.
  6. ^"Draft Code of Practice for Fertilizer Description and Labeling". Fertilizer Industry Federation Association (FIFA). 2008-09-15. Retrieved 3 February 2010.
  7. ^Glass, Anthony (September 2003). "Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Crop Plants: Physiological Constraints upon Nitrogen Absorption". Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences22 (5): 453. doi:10.1080/713989757.
  8. ^Vance; Uhde-Stone & Allan (2003). "Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a non renewable resource". New Phythologist (Blackwell Publishing) 157 (3): 423–447. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x. JSTOR 1514050.
  9. ^"Mergers in the fertiliser industry". The Economist. 18 February 2010. Retrieved 21 February 2010.
  10. ^ abcJ. B. Sartain, University of Florida ((c)2011). "Food for turf: Slow-release nitrogen". Grounds Maintenance
  11. ^United NationsFood and Agriculture Organization, Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options, Table 3.3 retrieved 29 Jun 2009
  12. ^Nitrogen Applied Newswise, Retrieved on October 1, 2008.
  13. ^Lawrence, Felicity (2004). "214". In Kate Barker. Not on the Label. Penguin. p. 213. ISBN 0-14-101566-7.
  14. ^Nitrogen Fertilization: General Information
  15. ^Avoiding Fertilizer Burn
  16. ^Aleksander Abram and D. Lynn Forster (2005). A Primer on Ammonia, Nitrogen Fertilizers, and Natural Gas Markets. Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, Ohio State University. p. 38
  17. ^IFA - Statistics - Fertilizer Indicators - Details - Raw material reserves (2002-10. Retrieved 2007-04-21.
  18. ^Sawyer JE (2001). "Natural gas prices affect nitrogen fertilizer costs". IC-4861: 8.
  19. ^"Table 8—Fertilizer price indexes, 1960-2007.".
  20. ^Enwall, Karin; Laurent Philippot,2 and Sara Hallin1 (December 2005). "Activity and Composition of the Denitrifying Bacterial Community Respond Differently to Long-Term Fertilization". Applied and Environmental Microbiology (American Society for Microbiology) 71 (2): 8335–8343. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8335-8343.2005. PMC 1317341. PMID 16332820. Retrieved Feb 1 2010.
  21. ^Birkhofera, Klaus; T. Martijn Bezemerb, c, d, Jaap Bloeme, Michael Bonkowskia, Søren Christensenf, David Duboisg, Fleming Ekelundf, Andreas Fließbachh, Lucie Gunstg, Katarina Hedlundi, Paul Mäderh, Juha Mikolaj, Christophe Robink, Heikki Setäläj, Fabienne Tatin-Frouxk, Wim H. Van der Puttenb, c and Stefan Scheua (September 2008). "Long-term organic farming fosters below and aboveground biota: Implications for soil quality, biological control and productivity". Soil Biology and Biochemistry (Soil Biology and Biochemistry) 40 (9): 2297–2308. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.007. Retrieved Feb 1, 2010.
  22. ^Lal, R. (2004). "Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security". Science (Science (journal)) 304 (5677): 1623–7. doi:10.1126/science.1097396. PMID 15192216.
  23. ^Rees, Eifion (3 July 2009). "Change farming to cut CO2 emissions by 25 per cent". The Ecologist. Retrieved 2 February 2010.
  24. ^Fliessbach, A.; P Maeder(2), A Diop(3), LWM Luttikholt(1), N Scialabba(4), U Niggli(2), Paul Hepperly(3), T LaSalle(3) (2009). "ClimateChange: GlobalRisks,ChallengesandDecisions". P24.17 Mitigation and adaptation strategies – organic agriculture. IOPConf. Series: EarthandEnvironmentalScience6(2009)242025: IOP Publishing. Retrieved 2 February 2010.
  25. ^PIMENTEL, David; PAUL HEPPERLY, JAMES HANSON, DAVID DOUDS, and RITA SEIDEL (July 2005). "Environmental, Energetic, and Economic Comparisons of Organic and Conventional Farming Systems". BioScience. pp. ol. 55, No. 7, Pages 573–582. Retrieved 2 February 2010.
  26. ^Mäder, Paul; Andreas Fliebach,,1 David Dubois,2 Lucie Gunst,2 Padruot Fried,2 Urs Niggli1 (31 May 2002). "Soil Fertility and Biodiversity in Organic Farming". Science (Science) 296 (5573): 1694–1697. doi:10.1126/science.1071148. PMID 12040197. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
  27. ^"Acta Horticulturae". Actahort.org. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  28. ^"AZ Master Gardener Manual: Organic Fetilizers". Ag.arizona.edu. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  29. ^"Healthy Lawns—Fertilizers vs. soil amendments". Ipm.ucdavis.edu. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  30. ^"Crazy about Compost" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  31. ^"CSA". Md1.csa.com. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  32. ^"Researchers Study Value of Chicken Litter in Cotton Production". July 23, 2010.
  33. ^"Algae: A Mean, Green Cleaning Machine". USDA Agricultural Research Service. May 7, 2010.
  34. ^"In a natural organic system, nitrate in the soil is derived from the gradual breakdown of humus". Ecochem.com. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  35. ^"Why not utilize urea as a source of N in organic agriculture. | Neves, M. C. P., De-Polli, H., Peixoto, R. T. dos G., Almeida, D. L. de | CC&T, Cadernos de Ciência & Technologia | Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária". Cababstractsplus.org. 2007-04-27. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  36. ^Human urine conversion to struvite
  37. ^"Organic Farming | Agriculture | US EPA". Epa.gov. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  38. ^"CalOrganic Farms News". Calorganicfarms.com. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  39. ^Schrack, Don (2009-02-23). "USDA Toughens Oversight of Organic Fertilizer: Organic fertilizers must undergo testing". The Packer. Retrieved 19 November 2009.
  40. ^USA (2010-07-06). "Isolation and Study of Cultures of Chinese Vetch Nodule Bacteria". Pubmedcentral.nih.gov. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  41. ^Uphoff, Norman Thomas (2006). Biological approaches to sustainable ... - Google Books. ISBN 9781574445831. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  42. ^ abgoogle.com/search
  43. ^"Can I Use This Input on My Organic Farm?". eXtension. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
  44. ^Alternative Farming Systems Information Center. "Organic Production and Organic Food: Information Access Tools". Nal.usda.gov. Retrieved 2010-08-25.

External links

Convince yourself of our products for your applications.

We recommend the following products for your process medium:

hose pinch valves

hose diaphragm valves

gate valves

diaphragm valves

ball valves and plug valves

butterfly valves